J.S Snee wrote:It's on the fourth row up
d1rge wrote: Initially I didn't think I was up to it, but maintaining a stubborn approach works admirably.
HrothgarZachachaeus wrote:Amazing! What a fun topic! How droll an activity! I could go on for hours looking at all your paragraphs writ without that silly symbol! Ah, living without it is now normal for yours truly. In fact, I don't know what all this fuss is about. Try writing as much as you can starting all words with it! It's hard! This is simply...
Okay, I admit, this is difficult. I thought I would start a post and just go on ad infinitum until it got boring, but it's truly hard! I'll probably call it quits soon. Wait, what's a long word I could add which would aid my post's growth? I saw floccinaucinihilipilification, that was good. What about honorificabilitudinitatibus? I think that's from a famous British bard, in his play As you...lick it? Mic it?....I can't call it to mind...But anyway, this bard actually didn't coin this word. Look it up! It occurs in a work by Dant--- uh, by Signor Alighi---, uh, by that Italian guy who did a Divin-- uh, you know, Inf--, a long po--, uh, with Purgatorio and Paradiso following it...Whoo! That was almost my undoing. Ho passato tanti anni con i libri antichi! Guarda quanto di buono m'hanno fatto!
Sorry, I won't go Italian on you again. I'm hungry. I'm going to lunch. Ta-ta! Torno subito! (Oops.)
Ned Henderson wrote: This is a jolly first class bash at our task. Good that you bring in a lit. factor adding a touch of distinction to what was frankly turning a jot humdrum. Pity that longing for food should halt your contribution but I trust you had a tasty snack.
HrothgarZachachaeus wrote:... Think about it: with all the variant pronunciations ...
...
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot], czar and 0 guests