


Tarbaby wrote:It's funny that this should come out right after I finally broke down and bought an H2...
Cuyler wrote:Tarbaby wrote:It's funny that this should come out right after I finally broke down and bought an H2...
Comparing the Zoom H2 with the H1, I am not sure that the H2 is still not the better deal. As you say the H2 costs less than $150 US and comes with a lot of options. Most significantly, it has 4 microphones which gives you better stereo imaging (or at least that's what they say). Also it can be attached directly to a computer as a USB microphone. Plus it comes with the accessories like a power adapter, USB cable, windscreen, stand, etc that is an additional $25 US package for the Zoom H1.
Does everyone take advantage of all those extra recording features the H2 offers? Or when setting up for recording a guitar do you just use a 90° pattern?
The smaller H1 would probably be better for people that don't want to mess with menus (since all functions have a dedicated button). That and it doesn't look like a cheap electric shaver.
I'm thinking maybe getting the inexpensive Zoom H1 now and wait for the prices to come down on the higher-end recorders in a few years when I am ready for fancy features.
rojarosguitar wrote:.…the power supply is something I wouldn't like to miss, as the battery drain is substantial. I record almost allways with the power supply, which is very, very quiet (no hum). I use the batteries basically for maintaning the setup (and date).
Cyril wrote:How does the H2 compare to the H4N just in terms of sound quality (not all the other functions)? Will the H1 have any built-in effects like reverb if you want to avoid using software?
Cyril
Return to Classical guitar recording and amplification
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot], John Fuary and 3 guests