Thank you guitarrista for your kind comment. Since you took the time to post the same comment on each of the five threads, I am answering you in each thread also. You are saying in your kind comment, that my posting is breaking the rules of the forum. In each of the five threads (in my opinion) the subject is absolutely of unique interest to the guitarist who will visit the thread. Interest? How can we verify that there is any interest? The number of the views and the comments of the participants is a safe guide for one to verify if there is a unique interest in each thread. Also, in what period span these views and comments happened. Let’s see below the beginning dates of the threads and the total views, as of today, the 21 Sep. 2017:
If I had over-reacted I would have answered you in an over-reacted manner, which one can confirm that this did not happen, contrary to that, my answer was polite and did not insult you in any way (contrary to your accusation, which is by itself an over-reaction indeed). I respected your opinion, so please do not say that I over-reacted, do not try to build your arguments on events that did not occur, my initial text as an answer to you is there for anyone to read and over-reaction (as you write) did not occur.guitarrista wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:17 pmYou don't have to over-react; I wish you no ill will, just pointing out what the sub-forum rule is. Normally I would not have even noticed this, but as up to five threads show up in "New posts" almost daily for weeks, I did.
There is no need to explain or argue why you think you are allowed five threads when the rule says one thread per person.
As for administrators, part of the good will and respect toward the forum, for me, is to get to the point where almost no administrative enforcing is needed because rules are respected in the first place. Cheers.
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot], kertsopoulos and 3 guests